3.1
Assessing the risk of cyanobacterial proliferation and the systems
performance in controlling this risk
Please mark the fields you
consider most appropriate for the water-body you are assessing. Then enter the reasons
for your assessment and enter an estimate of the uncertainty of your
assessment.
Were any of the following
indications of cyanotoxin occurrence observed? Example for filling in this table
For this assessment,
supporting expertise is recommended in the areas of public health, toxicology,
and limnology, particularly phytoplankton.
|
|
N |
O |
F |
? |
Your assessment of the
situation |
Description of the uncertainty
of your assessment |
|
Humans / animals: Illness
indicating the presence of cyanotoxins? Link to background information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cyanotoxins observed at > 1 µg/L, particularly
microcystins? Link to cyanotoxin overview |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cyanobacteria visual inspection:
Dont confuse with Lemna
minor ("duckweed") Secchi
disc readings or turbidity that indicate cyanobacterial proliferation? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cyanobacteria in quantities > 1 mm³/L Biovolume detected by
microscopy, or Link to
an introduction to determining Microcystis
spp., Planktothrix
agardhii and P. rubescens, Aphanizomenon
flos-aquae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N = not observed
?= no information
For this assessment, supporting expertise is strongly recommended in
limnology particularly with a focus on phytoplankton ecology.
Note: the categories suggested here provide very rough
first estimates, and entries performed without such expertise are subject to
major uncertainty.
|
|
N |
P |
Y |
? |
Your assessment of the situation |
Description of the
uncertainty of your assessment |
|
|
Overall condition of the water-body |
Is it eutrophic; deep with
stable thermal stratification or shallow and usually mixed; not acidic; water
retention time > 1 month ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current situation |
·
Is the water temperature high,? ·
If the water-body stratifies in
summer, is it stably stratified now? ·
Are TP-concentrations > 10-30
µg/L ? ·
Is Secchi Disc transparency < 1
m ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
? = no
information
Are current and
future nutrient loads under sufficient control in order to meet the target level for this water-body?
For this assessment, supporting expertise is needed in the areas of
limnology or geoecology, particularly with a focus on estimating or modelling
nutrient budgets in water-bodies. Without such expertise, entries are subject
to major uncertainty.
|
|
W |
P |
N |
? |
Your
assessment of the situation |
Uncertainty
of this assessment |
|
Assessment through site inspection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment through modelling loads |
|
|
|
|
|
W = well under control
P = partially under control
N = not sufficiently controlled
? = no information
On to è Evaluation of your assessment