Example
for Zeulenroda Reservoir:
Are current and
future nutrient loads under sufficient control in order to meet the target level for this water-body?
|
|
W |
P |
H |
? |
Your
assessment of the situation |
Uncertainty
of this assessment |
|
Assessment through site inspection |
|
|
X |
|
Site inspection largely confirmed the
land use assumptions which feed our loading model, although it also indicated
that some of the farms in the catchment no longer appear to be operated. |
Overall good confirmation of the data. |
|
Assessment through modelling loads |
|
|
X |
|
Modelling
loads showed them o be about twofold above the target level that was
determined for Reservoir Z. |
Weaknesses of the load model are the
depiction of small-scale variability in land use. Overall however, model
predictions are well supported by the loading measurements available. Also,
definition of the target load is uncertain because its availability for
cyanobacterial growth in the reservoir is unclear (see Report by Opitz et al.
2004). Overall information basis is
satisfactory; improving load estimate currently should not be a priority. |
W = well under control
P = partially under control
N = not sufficiently controlled
? = no information
Back to è Assessing the risk of cyanobacterial
proliferation